Approved AWC photo showing a roof edge with a newly installed metal gutter
AWC gutter project photo. It documents roof-runoff collection work, not a complete site-drainage installation or a guaranteed drainage outcome.

Map where water first appears

Water near a wall can arrive from more than one visible direction. The review boundary should extend from plausible upstream collection points to the observed low area.

Trace roof, surface and opening context

Mark the affected wall length, adjoining surfaces, thresholds and accessible discharge route. Mark collection points, the observed wet area, the intended outlet, surfaces to remain, and the route crews and materials can use. List testing, excavation, finish restoration and inaccessible piping separately. That makes it possible to compare whether proposals address the same water path rather than merely using the same drainage label.

  • Show roof edges and downspouts
  • Show wall openings and finish changes
  • Show the downstream route
  • Keep property lines and utilities visible when known

Protect the investigation area

Repeated wetting can affect finishes or concealed materials, but surface appearance alone cannot classify the damage. Excavation or controlled opening can reveal a different pipe route, unsuitable connection, damaged substrate or additional affected finish. The scope should identify who reviews that finding, what evidence is recorded and which work pauses. Utility, structural, environmental or permit questions remain with the responsible qualified party before the drainage boundary expands.

Separate wall repair from drainage correction

Use dated rain observations and the same photo positions when practical. Drainage closeout should show the accessible route worked on, installed or retained components, surface restoration, approved changes and the intended discharge condition observed during the agreed review. It should also list untested buried sections and excluded upstream or downstream work. A completion photo alone cannot establish performance in every future storm.

Record rain timing and changes

Compare localized correction and broader reconstruction against the verified water path. A useful option ties its method to the observed route and property constraints. It identifies who supplies drainage components, what paving or landscape is disturbed, how excavated material is handled, which finishes return, and when the area can reopen. Product requirements and verified elevations guide installation; the guide cannot select a system from a photograph.

Prepare the field evaluation

Send a wall-wide view, the downstream area and the timing of the observation. Include the nearest roof outlet, threshold, drain or paving transition when relevant. Where the route, elevations, concealed connections or restoration limits remain unclear, AWC may recommend the $250 Site Evaluation + Written Bid Package. The fee is credited if the resulting project is approved within 30 days. Prepare safe water-path photos, known drain information and the approving owner or manager before the visit.

The next decision

Trace the observed route before pricing a finish or surface-only repair.

Continue planning